Bebot

Only two dollars? Um, yes please:

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFG7-Q0WI7Q&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1&w=580&h=470]
(via waxy)

Like Colonel Sanders Pole Dancing

I'm always entertained by Alton Brown, and this little clip from Serious Eats is no exception:

http://blip.tv/play/AfeHdIKEWA

Paper Heart

Boy oh boy does this look like a cool and sweet movie:

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmVQLmaA0fQ&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1&w=580&h=470]
(via a cup of jo)

Yo Mama (is nice!)

McSweeney's, that wellspring of wit, has a new take on Yo Mama humor from Lucas Klauss. Exempli gratia:

Yo mama is so attractive she could be on the cover of Prevention.

Definitive

Look, I'm pretty pumped about the new Star Trek movie, but I think it's time something was settled once and for all:

http://current.com/e/90029658/en_US

Always a Blind Tasting

I know I've covered this ground before, but the New York Times' series of audio/photo essays about various NYC citizens, One In 8 Million, is infinitely fascinating whether the subject is mundane or extraordinary.

Today's entry is about a wine taster, blinded by diabetes in the mid-90's, who continues her wine-selection work despite her loss of sight.

Horseshoes and Hand Grenades

Talk about a letdown:

After surviving several storms during its 10-month voyage, the junk broke in two and sank after it was rammed by a freighter just off Taiwan's coast.


I disagree, though, with the captain's proclamation of failure. I consider Taiwan easily close enough to maintain the plausibility of the historical claim, and it's not as if the ship sank because of its design. I doubt many contemporary vessels would survive that kind of collision.

You can find more information about the ship's construction and history on the project's website. The English is a little spotty but clear enough, and the details are fascinating.

Raps

Feast your ears on this tasty new Deepspace5 track, and your eyes on this cool video:

http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=2921479&server=vimeo.com&show_title=1&show_byline=1&show_portrait=0&color=ffffff&fullscreen=1
"Raps" from the Stuff on Vimeo.

(via Patrick, who really oughtta put this on tasty hip hip treats)

Reader, not.

Earlier today Trey wondered why Readernaut didn't get more props. It happens that I've been working through some thoughts on said website and others.

I consider Readernaut, along with Cork'd and 97 Bottles, to fit into a category of websites that I'll call (for want of a simple and short descriptor) "activity trackers". These web apps represent social networks built around common consumption, be it reading books or drinking wine. Members discuss, rate, and list what they have individually consumed. There may be a few extra bells and whistles specific to each activity (a "cellar" for Cork'd, for example), but the basic structure is the same.

The three websites I've specified are all pretty sweet - most everything seems to work as described and there are detailed methods for sharing the specifics of your intake without overwhelming the user. The problem I have with each of them, however, is that they all seem to make clerical work out of my leisure time. If I want to make good use of these websites, I can't simply read my book. I have to pull up Readernaut and enter the last page number when I'm finished. And when I'm done, there's the compulsion to render an opinion, or at least remember to rate the book. And no longer can I just try a new beer at Capital Ale House (heaven help my taste buds' memory if it's the first of a few). I have to recall the name, taste, aroma, color, and so on. Should I whip out my Moleskine and jot down tasting notes for later? How reliable will my notes be after beer number three?

Maybe some iPhone apps would help, but then I'm still that guy pulling out my doodad to take notes or post a rating. And I still have to add routine to my leisure time.

All of this probably indicates little other than me not being the target audience of these web apps. But maybe the reason Readernaut doesn't get much attention is because I'm in the majority. That doesn't make these web apps bad; I'm simply suggesting that they're likely to be relegated to a niche market.

The Gentlest Gentleman

And now, on a lighter note (or a series of lighter notes), here's Shara Worden of My Brightest Diamond performing a sweetly simple version of "The Gentlest Gentleman":

http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3744221&server=vimeo.com&show_title=1&show_byline=1&show_portrait=0&color=ffffff&fullscreen=1
My Brightest Diamond - The Gentlest Gentleman from LaundroMatinee on Vimeo.

Boxed Water?

Okay - so there's this new company, Boxed Water Is Better LLC, and their product is...Boxed Water. Coming in a pleasantly designed milk-carton-style container, it sounds nice enough on the surface: Flat packed empty packaging is easier to transport, made of 90% renewable and recyclable materials, and the whole operation is focused on sustainability. I could see how it would be perceived as a better choice than plastic bottles...

But they're still selling packaged water.

Once the containers are filled they still have to be transported, and with every 1,000 gallons weighing over 4 tons (when you include the weight of packaging) that's a lot of fuel to burn. And recyclable or not, all those containers must be manufactured. The only major advantage I see here, in fact, is that Boxed Water may break down more easily in a landfill when non-recycling types just toss them in the trash - except they're probably coated in wax since they have to hold liquid, so scratch that idea.

I'm not an advocate for bottling companies but I think there are advantages to bottles over boxes, the first of which is strength. I can't see a paper-based container holding up to the rigors of a mostly-filled backpack, for example. Based on the pictures of Boxed Water, I also don't see a cap (which makes sense if they cartons start out flat-packed) which means once it's open, it's open until it's done. Make sure you keep it upright!

Look, just buy a few good reusable bottles, and a filter pitcher or something. Boxed Water sounds like mild greenwashing to me.

Going Nuclear...Twice.

BBC News is carrying a flabbergasting story about Tsutomu Yamaguchi, a 93-year-old Japanese man who survived both the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombs at the end of World War II.

Visualization

Photographer Marc Silber got a hold of some rare footage of Ansel Adams describing what he meant by the "visualization" of photographs. This clip was a real thrill for me, seeing and hearing the great Adams speak about one of his fundamental concepts.
(via kottke)

Clip your phrases with a sharpened hockey stick.

Rosecrans Baldwin made me crack up with his survey of accents around the English-speaking world and how to impersonate them in a jam. I think this was my clear favorite:

Accent: Irish

Scenario: After a short Dublin breakfast, it’s time for a drink. You find a pub suitably Irish without an obvious thing for tourists. Local contractors on their coffee break watch your entrance. The bartender nods and asks what you’d like.

Tips & Tricks: The Irish accent is one of the world’s most beautiful, and nobody knows it better than the Irish. Frankly, you don’t stand a chance of sliding by. Your best bet is to impersonate Colin Farrell on a bender and punch out the whole crowd.

Response: Don’t even try it. They will kill you.

Breaded To the Point Of Parody

Mercy me, but Patton Oswalt's review of the KFC Famous Bowl is funny enough to bust guts.

Meme Fail?

I can't decide whether FAIL stickers are totally awesome or an example of how this meme is way overripe.
(via uncrate)

Micrographtacular

It turns out Flickr has a group devoted to Scanning Electron Microscopy, and it's completely captivating - even if some of the images are freaky and surreal.

Remixing YouTube

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzZi-btc8AA&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1&w=580&h=470]

File this under the "too amazing not to post even though everybody else is doing it" department, but Kutiman's project, ThruYou, is one of the most incredible media experiments I've yet seen.

This audio/video cut-and-paste represents, to me, the very best of the Internet's potential. YouTube became a gigantic repository of largely user-generated material which has become reasonably easy to mine. An enterprising (and brilliant according to my ears) musician needed only to piece together samples from a seemingly endless pool of candidates. I'm sure Kutiman may not have been the first, but he sure is good. I'd like to see more of this - there's so much material available, and plenty of talented mixers out there.

And, more broadly, I'd love to see what else clever artists can assemble from the mass of content at their collective disposal.

Master of Simile

A smart, talented, accomplished writer-actor like Myers spending years meticulously creating, rehearsing, and refining an obnoxious one-note cartoon like Guru Pitka is a like a group of brilliant scientists working around the clock for a decade to build a malfunctioning fart machine...


Nathan Rabin in his dissection of The Love Guru

Raisin Brahms

This is seriously the funniest public service announcement I've ever seen. Guten taaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaag!

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOsbyuLyPbE&hl=en&fs=1&w=580&h=470]

Space Invaders

Dig this sweet Space Invaders-in-real-life style video from Röyksopp for their latest single:

http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3281558&server=vimeo.com&show_title=1&show_byline=1&show_portrait=0&color=ffffff&fullscreen=1
Happy Up Here from Röyksopp on Vimeo.
(via kottke, from whom I rarely re-post because he's so widely read, but I couldn't help myself with this one)

Andy Richter is the new announcer for The Tonight Show!

Holy smacintosh, this is awesome news: Andy Richter, Conan's original sidekick on Late Night, will rejoin the red-headed pale man as The Tonight Show's announcer on June 1st.

I promise...

If only I could get everybody who sends email in my office to sign one of these...
(via swissmiss)

UPDATE: Ack...fixed the link.

Radiohead + Dave Brubeck = AWESOME

This is seriously one of the coolest musical experiments I've yet heard, and I've been listening to it repeatedly:

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYa7furgQsA&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&w=580&h=470]
(via waxy)

Food Fail Around Richmond

There's a new website for food in the Richmond area called Food Around Richmond. I'm going to gently dismantle it today.

The first thing that slaps me in the face is something I can't say too much about, but it's still worth a mention: It looks pretty foul. Yeah, I'm using a slightly broken Wordpress theme myself, and I've not taken the time to clean it up. That doesn't mean I can't recognize another website with visual issues. The header appears to be three stock food photos of varying size stitched awkwardly together with a not-so-appetizing transparent embossed "Richmond" stretching nearly the full width. There's the tag cloud, the 500-ish wasted pixels below every post dedicated to subscribing, tags, sharing, advertising, etc.

Oh yeah, the "advertising." The entire website feels like an ill-conceived money-making project. There are four permanent spots for sponsor placement in addition to the banner ad at the end of each post. So far they're all empty (though the banner advertising is BOTH "cheap" and "affordable"!). You know why? Because nobody really reads this website yet. It's as if the site owner erected billboards in the middle of farm land that might possibly have a road built through it someday.

But you know what? You could have an ugly website littered with ad space and still have a winner if you have good content. The content, though, is the most unfortunate part of Food Around Richmond...

Problem #1: There have been five reviews since February 9th, and the first three were chains. Richmond is replete with outstanding and varied independent restaurants. It's nearly criminal to start off a local food blog with a review of Outback Steakhouse.

Problem #2: Four of the five reviews have been well outside of the city limits. The only review of a restaurant in Richmond proper was for Weezie's Kitchen.

Problem #3: No links to restaurant websites. Sure, "the social networking application of Twitter and YouTube is cool," (lifted directly from the site) but you can hardly talk about the social aspects of the web if you're not linking to the websites of the restaurants you review. I know not every eatery has a website of their own, but that's not the case for Weezie's or the three chains reviewed on the site. Restaurant websites nearly always have menus, pictures, and other useful information, so it's unfortunate that Food Around Richmond couldn't include links.

Problem #4: The "twist of video" for each post doesn't add much. I don't expect a new site to have professional video production, but these short segments don't serve the food well. The shots are often too close to focus, and the lighting is usually too dark which frequently leads to the food looking unappetizing.

Problem #5: Food blogging usually requires food writing, and the writing here just isn't that good. I don't mean to insult the author(s) because not everybody writes well. I don't consider myself a good writer, but you don't have to be a good performer to recognize whether a performance is good. The style here is too direct, adding little more than simple descriptions and statements of fact.

It's not that I expect a fledgling food blog to be A+ in it's first few weeks, but there are already several solid food columns and blogs in the Richmond area that you can't avoid good examples if you spend five minutes looking for them. I don't mean to say that you shouldn't start your own food blog just because there are some out there, but it would be hard to take you seriously if you're just more noise instead of at least standing tall among the existing players. If the goal is to rake in some advertising dollars, as seems to be the point with Food Around Richmond, you have to do at least as well as Richmond.com. I just don't see that so far.

If you want a broader perspective of food in the Richmond area, check out Richmond Good Life's sprawling aggregation of reviews, etc. You'll find links to plenty of worthy Richmond food reads and even write-ups of restaurants by other blogs/sites around town.